OurWord.See how people before you handled it.

Arlie Hochschild

The second shift

The shift that starts when work ends

The Second Shift, 1989; time-use surveys of the 1960s–70s

Housework and care have never appeared on a timesheet. Who ends up paying when nobody counts them.

Arlie HochschildThe shift that starts when work ends

What actually happened?

In 1989 Hochschild gave the thing a name: the second shift. Women with jobs came home to another one — cooking, cleaning, children, ageing parents, all unpaid and absent from every statistic. Adding paid and unpaid hours from the time-use surveys of the period, she found women worked about 15 hours a week more than men, which over a year is an extra month of 24-hour days. The power of the concept isn't the accusation. It made invisible labour countable.

Work that misses the timesheet is paid for by whoever does it

Any work that isn't measured gets treated as something done in passing. It doesn't disappear for going unrecorded; it becomes one person's invisible load, and that person often has no language to complain in, because on paper nothing happened.

'You don't work, you're at home' stings because it prices a ten-hour day at zero.

List it before you divide it

Most negotiations about chores fail not because nobody will share but because the two people are looking at different lists. Write every task down with the hours it takes each week and the argument moves from 'you don't appreciate me' to a table you can work on.

Log two weeks: who did what, how long. The gap is usually between what's remembered and what happened.

Care time can't be compressed, only moved or dropped

You can stay up late and write a document faster. You cannot feed a child faster or sit with a sick parent faster. Care work is close to rigid in duration, so 'efficiency' barely applies. It can only be taken over by someone else, or not done — and then someone else pays.

Families hoping better organisation will free up time usually free up sleep.

How do I use it today?

Where you are: the work at home lands on you, and saying so has changed nothing.

Ask first: are the two of us looking at the same list? If not, spend two weeks writing it all down before discussing who does what.

Where it goes wrong: using the concept as a moral charge, which turns the conversation into a tally of old debts; or the reverse — 'it's hard on everyone' erases the list all over again.

Lines to keep

About 15 hours more a week. A year of that is an extra month.

The first shift is at work, the second at home. Only one pays.

Labour nobody books gets billed to one person anyway.