OurWord.See how people before you handled it.

The Old Regime and the Revolution

The centralisation that survived

Overturn everything, inherit the core

The Old Regime and the Revolution, Book Two

The Revolution claimed a clean break with the past. The unbroken line Tocqueville dug out of the provincial archives.

The Old Regime and the RevolutionOverturn everything, inherit the core

What actually happened?

In the provincial archives Tocqueville found that the central administration everyone credited to the Revolution or to Napoleon was in fact an institution of the old regime, and the only part of it left standing afterwards. For a century and more the monarchy had used its intendants to hollow out the nobility and pull every matter to Paris; by 1789 local self-government was already a shell. So the Revolution destroyed the crown, the nobles and the church as appearances, and took the centralising machine over intact, then ran it harder.

What gets replaced is the appearance; what stays is the structure

Signs, slogans and the names of the people in charge are the easy part. The pipes power actually runs through are the hard part, because whoever takes over discovers on day one how useful they are. Judge a change by approvals, budget authority and information flow.

A large reorganisation renames every department and rotates the executives. Three months later the same few people still sign the budget, and the change happened only in slides.

Revolutionaries fall in love with the tools of the people they overthrew

A centralising machine is irresistible to anyone governing: ready-made, efficient, point and shoot. So those who overthrow it almost always inherit and reinforce it. If you want a bad structure to die, dismantle it during the handover, before the new owner grows attached.

The incoming head denounces one-man rule, then finds that centralised decisions are fast. Six months on it is one-man rule with a different mouth.

The stronger the sense of rupture, the harder to look for the continuity

Tocqueville's method is worth stealing. Everyone was saying 1789 divided two worlds; he read deeds, tax rolls and the correspondence of intendants, and found the line nobody could see. For any earth-shattering change, ask what passed through it untouched.

Each time an industry declares a change of paradigm, check the channel structure and who takes the margin. The new throne usually stands on the old foundation.

How do I use it today?

Where you are: a thorough change has just finished and everything looks new.

Ask first: have the pipes that money, approvals and information actually run through changed at all? What came through unaltered?

Where it goes wrong: reading a new surface as a new structure, or using nothing ever really changes to deny progress that is real.

Lines to keep

Centralisation is an institution of the old regime, not a creation of the Revolution.

They built the new order out of the debris of the old.

Of all the institutions the Revolution destroyed, this one alone survived.

Same situation, other people are asking

We fell into the same hole again.New people, same mistakes.I have replaced the people and the same fight came back.We punished the person who did it and it happened again.The same mistakes keep happening · all 9 questions →

If this one named what you are going through,

send it to someone who needs it, or keep it somewhere you will find it again.