Literacy trains not knowledge, but the ability to exclude emotion from reasoning
Marriott argues that literacy's true function is to exclude charisma, emotion, and other irrational persuasion from public reasoning; the decline of reading means emotion-driven politics is returning.
The video won't play here. Listen to the audio instead:
The argument · timestamps estimated from transcript position
Publishers masked true decline by raising prices on fewer sales
Marriott rejects the claim that stable book market revenues prove reading hasn't declined. Publishers' total profits have remained flat, but only because cover price increases have outpaced inflation—the actual number of books sold keeps falling. A Frankfurt Book Fair report announced for the first time that EU publishing's real revenue has dropped 30% over the past twenty years. A second overlooked factor: mass closures of public libraries in Britain and elsewhere have forced borrowers into bookstores, temporarily inflating retail figures and masking the true decline in reading.
— James MarriottText-to-image culture shift requires no statistics to be evident
Postman's 1984 Amusing Ourselves to Death contains no citations to data about reading or literacy decline—yet such data existed, having been collected after television's spread had already cut reading. Instead, Postman offers a broader argument: culture is shifting its center of gravity from text to image. Images are more direct, more powerful, and therefore will overwhelm text—a shift that may not be precisely quantifiable but cuts closer to the heart of the matter than any statistics. Marriott concedes that his book doesn't require every individual data point to hold; he only needs the large claim—that text culture is giving way to image culture—to stand.
— James MarriottTelevision's arrival halved Indian village fertility rates overnight
A classic study of rural India found television adoption and fertility decline happening in near-perfect sync: in the year TV arrived, average fertility fell from approximately 8 children to approximately 5. Monck uses this not primarily as an argument about reading, but as evidence for a larger mechanism: entertainment media directly displace other behaviors in the allocation of time. Television didn't simply crowd out reading; it became an irresistibly attractive alternative entertainment. Once it appeared, the most interesting thing in the house shifted from the bookshelf to the living-room screen—so compelling that even reproduction, of all things, lost time and energy to it. This serves Marriott as corroboration for his historical claim that television caused reading to plummet.
— Yascha MounkSmartphones demolished the last two defenses literacy still had
Marriott argues that the television era in fact preserved two defenses for reading that smartphones have now dismantled. First, early television programming remained deeply shaped by print culture—BBC could run a multi-hour debate on Britain's entry into the European Economic Community between Roy Jenkins and Tony Benn over economic data, all in the ‘print style’ of rational long-form argument. Second, television was fixed in the living room; during commutes, queuing, and layovers, the best entertainment option was still a book or magazine. Reading had territory of its own. The smartphone brought screens into these reading-occupied niches. Text culture has nowhere left to retreat.
— James MarriottEyes can move backward to verify; ears cannot
Scientists tracking eye movement in reading find that readers don't scan text at a constant speed; they constantly jump backward to re-check logical connections between phrases and sentences. This, Marriott argues, is text's most critical advantage over speech. When someone speaks, you follow at their pace; a skilled speaker can draw you forward via charm, humor, and cadence—you have no chance to stop and backtrack to verify whether the reasoning holds. Reading text lets you flip backward anytime, check and recheck, bring stronger analysis and criticism to bear on what's before you. This ‘reexaminability’ is why literate societies naturally think more richly and rigorously than oral ones.
— James MarriottWriting lets minds examine themselves; speech cannot support this
Marriott invokes Walter Ong's argument: writing lets us externalize part of our thinking. In oral culture, an idea exists only in the mind; it cannot be pulled out, re-examined, checked for flaws, or connected to another idea. Once written down, it can be reread, errors located, propositions connected one to the next—and this ability to critique one's own thought has no parallel in oral culture. Philosophy, mathematical proof, complex historical narrative: these forms of knowledge are not innate to human cognition but only become possible with the technology of writing.
— James MarriottIndustrial revolution required the republic of letters to produce
Economist Joel Mokyr (Nobel laureate) argues that the Industrial Revolution's core driver was Europe's ‘Republic of Letters’—a network of scientists and inventors who debated and learned from each other via letters and publications. The first steam engine was invented because its creator had access to fifty years of European debate preserved in publications about pressure and valves, not merely from tinkering in a workshop. Supporting evidence comes from research Henrich cites: the number of copies of Diderot's Encyclopédie circulating in a town correlated with the number of inventions that town submitted to the 1850 World's Fair. The point is not that reading an encyclopedia makes you an inventor, but that a region's degree of connection to the Republic of Letters predicts its innovative output.
— James MarriottLiteracy suppressed emotion from politics; its decline resurrects emotional rule
Marriott treats McLuhan's deepest insight as this: literate culture adds an emotional dampening layer to society. In oral culture, all information arrives in person, carrying the speaker's facial expression, tone, charisma—even height. Humans naturally fall more easily to persuasion from tall, emotionally skilled people, through irrational means. Text strips away these tools: you cannot shout at or weep over an article; the printed page demands that argument rely on reason rather than personal charm. Marriott sees the mid-20th-century highly literate societies as ‘emotionally cold’ precisely because this stripping was in effect—and this served democracy's reasoning mechanisms. Today, politics' emotional temperature is climbing again. The world of voices, faces, and charisma that literacy once suppressed is rushing back.
— James MarriottIn their own words · checked verbatim
The headline was that in the EU, publishing turnover had declined in real terms 30% in the last 20 years, which is a pretty severe decline.
James Marriott7:30
it’s just like getting a television is the most amazing contraceptive. The average number of children goes down from something like eight to five the year the television is introduced.
Yascha Mounk15:00
I think what the smartphone does that’s important and perhaps undernoticed is it just makes screens ubiquitous, and it wipes out all the other cultural space that literacy used to occupy—literacy has nowhere to thrive now.
James Marriott19:00
The phrase that Walter Ong uses is that writing allows us to externalize part of our minds.
James Marriott22:00
One of the crucial things that we do as readers—and we know this now because scientists have tracked the way our eyes move while reading—is that we’re constantly skipping backwards and forwards over text.
James Marriott24:00
one of the most striking things that Marshall McLuhan says about literacy is the way it emotionally desaturates a culture and a society.
James Marriott34:00
T.S. Eliot has a great line about the bombastic self-confidence of the mild-mannered man safely entrenched behind his typewriter, which has sometimes occurred to me as I’ve written some of my more bombastic opinion columns safely behind my desk.
James Marriott36:30
Figures
| US average daily reading time, 20-year decline | 40% | 1:30 |
| UK adults who have abandoned reading (past 20 years) | approximately one-third | 2:00 |
| EU publishing actual revenue, 20-year decline | 30% | 7:30 |
| India rural average fertility when television arrived | fell from approximately 8 to approximately 5 | 15:00 |
Glossary
- Reading Revolution
- A historical phenomenon in late 18th-century Europe when the reading population and reading volume surged simultaneously.
- Republic of Letters
- A transnational network of early modern European intellectuals who exchanged ideas through letters and publications.
- Ethnolinguistic fractionalization
- The degree to which a society is divided along dimensions of ethnicity, language, and religion.
- Post-literate
- The social state following the displacement of text culture by image culture.
How to listen
People concerned with 'why democracy is failing', and educators still blaming young people's lack of reading for everything.
The opening data disputes about the publishing industry carry low information density and can be skipped.