Mummification was meant to transform the dead into gods, not preserve them
Curator Campbell Price explains that wrapping, resin coating, and gold painting were designed to transform corpses into divine likenesses, not preserve the deceased person's appearance.
The video won't play here. Listen to the audio instead:
The argument · tap a timestamp to hear it
Body wrapping aimed to deify the dead, not preserve them
Campbell Price rejects the popular understanding that mummification was fundamentally about preserving the body forever. In earliest pre-dynastic tombs, bodies were buried in a curled sleeping position with cosmetics placed nearby to make them resemble the gods. The entire process of wrapping, oiling, resin-coating, and gilding was meant to reshape the dead person's appearance into a divine form, not to retain their living likeness. This religious transformation, not biological preservation, is the key to understanding the entire mummification tradition.
— Campbell PriceThe preservation-out-of-necessity theory falls apart under scrutiny
The standard explanation holds that after ancient Egyptians began building tombs and coffins, corpses no longer touched the drying desert sand directly and could not desiccate naturally—so they were forced to develop artificial mummification. But Campbell Price is skeptical of this neat division. He argues that religious processing may have begun while bodies still had contact with hot sand, driven not by a need to compensate for lost natural drying, but by theological purpose from the start.
— Campbell PriceNatron was a purification ritual, not a preservation formula
The natron used to process corpses was the same salt-based substance priests used daily for ritual bathing and spiritual purification before entering temples. It was even safe enough to chew directly. When applied to the dead, its primary function remained religious cleansing. The desiccation that resulted was a secondary biological effect, not an intentionally engineered preservation mechanism designed by ancient Egyptians who understood chemistry.
— Campbell PriceThe corpse was material for sculpting a god statue, not a person
During the Old Kingdom, plaster sometimes completely encased bodies—a practice paralleling the Levantine tradition of plastering skulls at Jericho. The logic was revealing: ancient Egyptians observed that stone and other inorganic materials outlasted living flesh by centuries. They decided to treat the corpse like the raw material for an eternal divine sculpture, not as a vessel to preserve the individual's appearance. This explains why photographs of mummies from Giza appear so impersonal and strikingly eerie.
— Campbell PriceFayum portraits were post-mortem idealizations, not funeral photographs
Modern viewers see the strikingly lifelike Fayum portraits attached to Roman-era mummy faces and romantically misread them as photographs of the deceased. Campbell Price points out that this is projection. The hairstyles on male portraits mimicked ruling Roman emperors; the female portraits copied empresses. Gold abundantly frames the images because the goal was always to present the dead as god-like—and Roman emperors themselves were worshipped as gods. These paintings were made after death, not from life.
— Campbell PriceGround mummy was sold as a sexual cure-all across Europe
The word "mummia" derives from Persian-Arabic origins, initially referring to a naturally occurring black substance from Iran. Europeans confused this with the black resinous pitch painted onto mummies to mimic the skin tone of Osiris, the god of the dead. The confusion transformed "mummy" into a European cure-all medicine. Ground mummy powder was especially believed to treat sexual dysfunction, and was even pulverized for use as paint pigment—Raphael and other Pre-Raphaelite painters used what they called "mummy brown" in their celebrated works.
— Campbell PriceVictorian horror of mummies reflects buried colonial guilt
Early 19th-century popular fiction depicted resurrecting mummies as beautiful women. By century's end, as Britain deepened its colonial grip on Egypt—including the 1882 bombardment of Alexandria—mummy imagery transformed into something vile: shambling, corrupt, inherently evil threats. Campbell Price sees this shift as unconscious colonial guilt projected outward: the lurking fear that the desecrated ancient dead of Egypt might someday return to exact revenge.
— Campbell PriceCT scans cannot reliably reveal mummy causes of death
Today mummies are typically studied by CT scanning rather than physical unwrapping, but Campbell Price warns that the technology has severe limitations. CT machines are calibrated for living bodies, which are about 70% water. Mummies are completely desiccated. On the resulting images, dried soft tissue merges visually with bone, becoming impossible to distinguish. Radiologists, archaeologists, and bioarchaeologists routinely argue over the same scans. The bottom line: unless an axe is literally embedded in the skull, there is a 99% chance that cause of death simply cannot be determined.
— Campbell PriceIn their own words · checked verbatim
No, I think this is a modern assumption that the reason you would treat the body is to keep it like, you know, you see grandma in the funeral home.
Campbell Price3:06
this is something that priests use to bathe so it's like having a salt scrub
Campbell Price18:54
Yes, the gods aren't looking like mummies, the mummy's looking like gods.
Dan Snow19:57
It's AI slop, guys. It's AI slop.
Dan Snow27:23
ground up for paper ground up for paint mummy brown paint some of the great pre-raphelite canvases really the brown is mummified flesh
Campbell Price33:47
the mummified dead in the earlier 1800s are often characterised as quite beautiful women, just reanimated. But then by the late 1800s, they're shuffling, dirty, evil, threatening.
Campbell Price34:49
So you cannot say in 99% of cases, unless someone has an axe through their head, you cannot say how someone died, really what conditions they had.
Campbell Price43:06
Figures
| Span of ancient Egyptian civilization | c. 3000 BCE to the Cleopatra era (approximately 3000 years) | 5:10 |
| Dating of Fayum mummy portraits | Primarily 2nd century CE | 26:23 |
| Champollion's decipherment of Egyptian hieroglyphs | 1822 | 38:54 |
| British bombardment of Alexandria | 1882 | 34:49 |
| Margaret Murray's distribution of mummy wrappings as souvenirs | Until 1908 (she lived to 100) | 40:58 |
| Water content of living human tissue | Approximately 70% | 41:59 |
| Rate at which CT scans cannot determine mummy cause of death | 99% | 43:06 |
Glossary
- natron
- A naturally occurring salt used by ancient Egyptian priests for ritual purification; when applied to corpses, it produced desiccation as a secondary effect.
- mummia
- A word derived from Persian-Arabic origin referring to the black resinous substance found on mummies; Europeans ground it into powder and sold it as a cure-all medicine.
- Fayum portraits
- Realistic painted portraits attached to mummy faces during the Roman period; they were post-mortem idealizations meant to depict the dead as divine rather than as accurate likenesses.
- unrolling party
- A social gathering of the Victorian era in which guests watched mummies being publicly unwrapped.
How to listen
Historians and content creators interested in ancient Egyptian religion, death rituals, museum curation, and Victorian-era curiosity culture.
The opening scene-setting about London's mummy unwrapping parties can be skipped, but the rest maintains steady information density with no obvious padding.