OurWord.See how people before you handled it.

Power and organisation

Han Feizi

Law, method, position

Han Feizi (Warring States · 280–233 BC) — Law, method, position.

What actually happened?

He had a stammer and could not argue in person, so he wrote. His essays reached the king of Qin, who read them and said that if he could meet this man he would die content, then invaded Han to get him. At the Qin court Han Fei was undone by a fellow student from his own teacher's school, Li Si, who was jealous of him and spoke against him; he was imprisoned and forced to take poison. The man who wrote the definitive analysis of persuasion and court intrigue was killed by a piece of court intrigue. Knowing and being able to do it are not the same faculty.

Law, method and position together

Law is the written rule everyone is held to; method is how you assess and check the people below you; position is the authority the seat itself carries. Missing the first, the rules get bypassed. Missing the second, you get compliance in form only. Missing the third, nobody listens.

The policy exists, nobody checks it, and the person enforcing it has no standing to say no. Any one of the three missing and the other two stop working.

People follow interest, not exhortation

He doesn't believe in natural loyalty; he believes in incentives. Design the system well and people behave the way you wanted. It is Munger's 'show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome', stated twenty-two centuries earlier.

The all-hands asked everyone to prioritise quality. Bonuses stayed tied to shipped count. Everyone shipped.

The difficulty of persuasion

The hard part of speaking, he wrote, is not what you know but working out what the listener actually cares about. He catalogued the fatal errors — exposing what they don't want exposed, speaking at the wrong moment, being too direct — and then died of one.

Your deck answered whether it could be built. The one person who could approve it was worried about who gets blamed if it fails.

How do I use it today?

When designing incentives for a team, ask what this system will make people do, not what it ought to make them do. People act on interest. Aligning what you want with what pays is the whole of the job.

Deep read

Read alongside

ZhuangziSame era, opposite answers: Han Feizi designs the machine, Zhuangzi declines to be a component. Thomas GordonTwo theories of getting compliance: rules and consequences, or naming the effect on you. Both work, on different things. John BoydTwo theories of an organisation that works: rules and consequences, or shared intent and delegated authority. XunziThe student pushed the teacher's training argument into a theory of control. Xunzi kept the rites; Han Feizi kept only the handles. Hannah ArendtHan Feizi asks how to build a system that works without relying on goodness; Arendt asks where obedience inside such a system ends up. One writes from the designer's chair, one from the operator's. Cao CaoThe theory and its practitioner. Han Feizi wrote the system down; cutting his hair in place of his head is that system demonstrated on the man at the top. MenciusBoth are writing about how to govern. Han Feizi trusts reward and punishment; Mencius asks whether people are still willing to follow you at all. Shang YangTheory and practice of the same school: Han Feizi wrote the system down, Shang Yang ran it, and both were killed by the thing they had built. MachiavelliThe two closest political realists East and West, seventeen centuries apart: both studied how power actually works, and both were destroyed by the power they studied. InfluenceTwo systems for moving people: Han Feizi designed law, technique and position two thousand years earlier, Cialdini found six triggers. Both are asking how to make people act as you want. Robert AxelrodNeither trusts human nature: Han Feizi holds reward and punishment himself so that nobody dares defect, Axelrod lengthens the relationship until nobody needs to - one runs on power, the other on repetition. Liu YanNeither counts on people being good: Han Feizi says do not rely on their goodness and rely on law and position instead, while Liu Yan names the particular device - rank and a way up - that makes keeping the rules pay in that seat. Edward DeciBoth are about how reward and punishment move people. Han Feizi calls them the ruler's two handles: grip them and people move. Deci found that paying for something people already loved left them doing less once the pay stopped. One treats reward as the engine; the other asks what the reward replaced. Yan YingBoth guard against being walled in by the people around you. Han Feizi relies on technique and audit, against ministers who hide things. Yan Ying relies on being someone people dare to tell, and on hearing the man out when he is told he was wrong. One closes the gaps from the system, the other opens up in himself first.

Further

Lines to keep

The difficulty of persuasion is knowing the listener's mind.

A thousand-mile dyke collapses from an ant hole.