OpenAI總裁斷言：網絡安全支出該超過軟件開發本身支出

核心論點 · 點時間戳可跳到原聲

原話 · 已逐字校驗

And there's always been this question of, is AI actually able to come up with new knowledge? And at this point, it's just impossible to deny, right? It is definitively, yes, possible.

一直以來都有一個問題：AI到底能不能產出真正的新知識？現在這一點已經不容否認——答案確定無疑是肯定的。

Greg Brockman2:06

So Dots is a proactive agent. It's always on, always working. You stop working, it keeps working.

Dots是一個主動式agent,始終在線、持續工作。你停下來了，它還在繼續跑。

Greg Brockman17:47

So first of all, I think that the best UI is no UI. And I think in AI, that is where we're going.

首先，我認為最好的UI就是沒有UI。我覺得AI正朝著這個方向發展。

Greg Brockman23:06

I do think the physics of cybersecurity are changing. And we're in what we call the defender's window.

我確實認為網絡安全的底層物理規律正在改變。我們現在處於所謂的「防禦者窗口期」。

Greg Brockman27:14

we took about 25% of our production engineers and said, all of your projects are on hold, you are just securing now.

我們讓大約25%的生產工程師暫停了所有項目，專職去做安全排查。

Greg Brockman30:27

I have a feeling that cyber spend, security spend, should actually vastly outstrip software spend.

我有一種感覺，網絡安全支出其實應該遠遠超過軟件本身的支出。

Greg Brockman33:29

We think that humans should be firmly in the driver's seat, should have control over the future, and that this technology should amplify human agency.

我們認為人類應該牢牢掌握方向盤，應該掌控未來，這項技術應該放大人的能動性。

Greg Brockman36:36

story of why Steve Jobs put the handle on the iMac, right, so that that way people could feel that they could control the machine, right, that you can always pick it up and throw it out the window.

這就是史蒂夫·喬布斯當年為什麼要在iMac上裝一個提手的故事——這樣人們能感覺自己能控制這臺機器，隨時可以把它拎起來扔出窗外。

Greg Brockman37:40

數字與實體

術語

DotsDots

OpenAI內部使用的主動式常駐agent,持續追蹤待辦與日程，人停下來它仍在工作

DaybreakDaybreak計劃

OpenAI向網絡防禦者開放頂尖模型能力的項目，承諾投入10億美元

defender's window防禦者窗口期

頂尖AI安全能力尚未被攻擊者廣泛獲取的有限時間窗口

debate / iterative amplification辯論式監督/迭代放大

讓另一個AI挑錯，幫人類監督超出自身核驗能力的AI輸出

generative UI生成式UI

AI根據當下需求實時生成定製界面，而非使用固定菜單按鈕

收聽指南