OpenAI总裁断言：网络安全支出该超过软件开发本身支出

核心论点 · 点时间戳可跳到原声

原话 · 已逐字校验

And there's always been this question of, is AI actually able to come up with new knowledge? And at this point, it's just impossible to deny, right? It is definitively, yes, possible.

一直以来都有一个问题：AI到底能不能产出真正的新知识？现在这一点已经不容否认——答案确定无疑是肯定的。

Greg Brockman2:06

So Dots is a proactive agent. It's always on, always working. You stop working, it keeps working.

Dots是一个主动式agent,始终在线、持续工作。你停下来了，它还在继续跑。

Greg Brockman17:47

So first of all, I think that the best UI is no UI. And I think in AI, that is where we're going.

首先，我认为最好的UI就是没有UI。我觉得AI正朝着这个方向发展。

Greg Brockman23:06

I do think the physics of cybersecurity are changing. And we're in what we call the defender's window.

我确实认为网络安全的底层物理规律正在改变。我们现在处于所谓的「防御者窗口期」。

Greg Brockman27:14

we took about 25% of our production engineers and said, all of your projects are on hold, you are just securing now.

我们让大约25%的生产工程师暂停了所有项目，专职去做安全排查。

Greg Brockman30:27

I have a feeling that cyber spend, security spend, should actually vastly outstrip software spend.

我有一种感觉，网络安全支出其实应该远远超过软件本身的支出。

Greg Brockman33:29

We think that humans should be firmly in the driver's seat, should have control over the future, and that this technology should amplify human agency.

我们认为人类应该牢牢掌握方向盘，应该掌控未来，这项技术应该放大人的能动性。

Greg Brockman36:36

story of why Steve Jobs put the handle on the iMac, right, so that that way people could feel that they could control the machine, right, that you can always pick it up and throw it out the window.

这就是史蒂夫·乔布斯当年为什么要在iMac上装一个提手的故事——这样人们能感觉自己能控制这台机器，随时可以把它拎起来扔出窗外。

Greg Brockman37:40

数字与实体

术语

DotsDots

OpenAI内部使用的主动式常驻agent,持续追踪待办与日程，人停下来它仍在工作

DaybreakDaybreak计划

OpenAI向网络防御者开放顶尖模型能力的项目，承诺投入10亿美元

defender's window防御者窗口期

顶尖AI安全能力尚未被攻击者广泛获取的有限时间窗口

debate / iterative amplification辩论式监督/迭代放大

让另一个AI挑错，帮人类监督超出自身核验能力的AI输出

generative UI生成式UI

AI根据当下需求实时生成定制界面，而非使用固定菜单按钮

收听指南